First: Some words about the private person Hendrik Meyer
Privately, I harbor opinions on many things. However, these are generally not of public interest. They are not authorized by my God, nor are they necessarily better founded and thus more important than the next man’s opinions and judgments. Therefore, I feel no urge to express my personal views on issues such as climate change, social justice, vegetarianism, the hemline of women’s skirts or whatever. And if I should, they are the opinions of an ordinary person, no more and no less.
But as people often find it difficult to distinguish between the messenger as a person and the message itself, I will make an exception in this case. I have read many books about the Second World War, about anti-Semitism and the persecution of Jews and their deprivation of rights and murder in the Third Reich. As a young man, I even visited concentration camp memorial sites. I saw all of what happened back then as heinous, unjustifiable crimes that filled me with horror and shame – and still do to this day.
The Holocaust from Euródin’s perspective
So far about Hendrik Meyer, the individual. Let’s now consider how Euródin must have viewed the years 1933 to 1945 from wide up there. Down on earth, he sees a man called Adolf Hitler wreaking endless havoc, who doesn’t even refer to the Germanic religion, but is an avowed Catholic to his end. The use of a few runes as decoration on uniforms and a Hindu rather than Germanic symbol such as the swastika doesn’t change this a bit. The Germanic religion played no role whatsoever for Hitler, who probably regarded it as a pathetic, feeble donkey in comparison to the then still mighty, shining steed of Christianity, which was to carry him to power. Otherwise, religion was probably not important to him at all. Consistently, people greeted each other on the street with not with “Heil Odin!”, “Heil Jesus!” or – even more plausible – with “Heil Deutschland!”, but, as is well known, with “Heil Hitler!” Hitler staged an extreme personality cult around himself, like all tyrants who instinctively know about the weakness and inconsistency of the idea that supports their power.
In doing so, he committed the first unforgivable sin from Euródin’s point of view. He put himself in the place of God, which no human being must do.
Furthermore, this Mr. Hitler waged a cruel and unprovoked war against his European brothers and sisters. He even wanted to declare the Eastern Europeans among them to be a race of inferior rank, basically turning them into slaves who were to farm the new, eastern Lebensraum for the German people. From Euródin’s point of view, this was Hitler’s second unforgivable sin. You must never disenfranchise and enslave your brother – neither in the biological nor in the divine family.
And what about the Jews? First of all, we need to clarify what “Jew” actually means from the vantage point of our God. Whether a Jewish race actually exists, or whether they are just an ethnic group, is a question that is not easy to answer, But, as it is irrelevant in this case anyway, we will not be pursue it further. Of paramount importance however is that there is no Jewish God. Yahweh is just another name for the Christian God, for Allah or for Vili – the African God. The decisive factor is therefore not whether someone declares themselves to be of Jewish faith, but which of the three actually existing gods Euródin, Vili or Vé consecrated their soul. Since many of the European Jews had lived here for centuries and often mixed with non-Jews, quite a lot of the “Jewish” victims of National Socialism must in fact have been Euródin’s own soul children and thus our European brothers and sisters via the rules of soul consecration. Hitler may not have been able to know this. But that doesn’t change the fact that the murder of the Jews was as well, at least to a considerable extent, fratricide.
Euródin will see it like this: the Jews were not going to plunge Germany into desaster, as Hitler claimed. They were just his scapegoat for everything that had gone wrong in German History. Therefore, there was no reason to force them into freight wagons, exploit and kill them. Thus, even if their murder was not fratricide, it was shameful. And Euródin certainly doesn’t demand that we erect monuments to celebrate these deeds, either. We Germans can and should be ashamed of it, and we could and should have atoned for it. But then Euródin will wonder about the impact of all this on His own Urvolk. Who was harmed by the murder of the Jews? Apart from being detrimental in a cultural, intellectual and economic respect (Jews have made and continue to make important contributions in all these fields), the damage was negligible. The murder of the “real” Jews primarily harmed, cynical as this may sound to our ears, the Jews, and thus the Urvolk of Vilis, not His own.
What follows for him from the Holocaust
Now I’m getting to the presumably most irritating part of my message: For Euródin, nothing follows from the Holocaust. The atrocity does not change his mission to us, to remain peacefully among us, to multiply and preserve us and to prepare us for Ragnarök, after which we – or at least those of us who profess our allegiance to him – are to establish a new society according to his rules, indeed a new European civilization. The past has happened and we can’t learn that much from history, if only because it never truly repeats itself. The newly arriving ethnic groups in Europe, mostly of African origin, will voluntarily return to their old homeland in large numbers after Ragnarök because a collapsed state, which is no longer able to support his citizens, will not be able to offer them a better life than at home for a long time. There is no need to deport them by force, and if you tried, they would fight back and the outcome of such a struggle would be more than uncertain. What happened in the thirties and forties of the twentieth century will not repeat itself either way.
Euródin has set us a goal for the future and the past is irrelevant for that. Ragnarök will not be the end of history. It will be the beginning of a new history, a zero hour, and all the myths, memories and monuments that we need beyond religion will only be determined and erected as we go along. The new history book opens with a virgin page and will gradually fill up again. The Holocaust will have no place in it, because it contributes nothing to the coexistence and cohesion of his Urvolk. Nor can anything fundamental be learned from it, because violence towards strangers outside the group – however displeasing it may be – is a part of human life and nature in general and can never be completely avoided, even if it was unjustified in the case of the Yews. On the other hand, a new common European version of history telling can and must be geared towards promoting unity and peace among us.
And what about those who disagree with that? Well, everything I say in the name of my God refers only to those who voluntarily profess their allegiance to him. The others – let them build their own state after Ragnarök, one with open borders and ethnic and religious neutrality, in which the Holocaust is the moral pivot from which everything else follows. Even if by that they will incur the wrath of their God.
Would there be a place for Jews (or other ethnic or religious minorities) in a state according to Euródin’s rules after Ragnarök?
For a state under Euródin’s Law – founded, mind you, by volunteers and at a time when the old state has ceased to exist – number fifteen of the Fifteen Truths and Obligations applies: “Those whose souls are consecrated by an alien god or no god can be our guests, but never part of our covenant.”
In concrete terms, this means that they can neither join a Church of Euródin nor hold civil rights. They will not be able to vote or be elected, and their other rights, from right of residence to gun ownership and property acquisition to employment as a civil servant, will also differ from those of a citizen, as is common even today for aliens in comparison to nationals. They have a right of residence as guests only, and their toleration will depend on their number and their usefulness for the community. And it must be stated clearly: Someone whose soul has not been consecrated by Euródin (as determined in proxy by their genetic lineage) cannot become a citizen of a state under Euródin’s law under any circumstances. Not even if they were world soccer player of the year, Nobel Prize winners or fabulously rich, if they promised to bring us immeasurable wealth. At best, they can be guests of such a state.
But given the somber historical background, does this have to apply to Jews as well? Do we not have to apply different standards in this case? Before I continue, I would once again like to let the private person Hendrik Meyer have his say. I have nothing against Jews. I have only had good experiences with them, I even perceive a likeness with us in the way they think, act and feel – precisely because they have often already mixed genetically with us Europeans. When I once traveled around the world as a young man, I also spent some time in Israel and was impressed by what the Israelis had already wrested from the desert with diligence, discipline and intelligence compared to their Arab neighbors. (Today, Israel is known to be one of the world’s leading countries in terms of science and technology). And nobody there asked me about my German origins.
But back to the prophet Meyer, who must proclaim what his God has told him to do. For the Jews, or those who call themselves such, in principle the same applies as for the others. If they are predominantly of European descent, they can, if they so wish, become members of a state under Euródin’s law – with all their rights, but duties as well. And this includes – because the confession would obviously have the status of a state religion in such a state – at least religious neutrality. That means they would not necessarily have to openly profess Euródin but would not be allowed to turn against him either. European citizens are not allowed to worship alien gods, that is part of their loyalty, and they can only be granted passive religious freedom, i.e. the right not to believe in anything. Only those who reveal themselves as children of Vili or Vé may continue to practice their old religion, be it Judaism, Islam, Buddhism or Hinduism, in a discreet, non-public manner and without proselytizing. (Christianity would in any case be forbidden in a state under Euródin’s law).
One concession, however, could be generosity in granting guest rights in the case of the Jews. After all, they are peaceful and industrious and not a threat to us, but on the contrary contribute intellectually, culturally and economically to our community.
Could Jews or other ethnic or religious minorities join the Profession before Ragnarök?
That may sound like a moot point. Why would anyone who sees themselves as Jewish, Muslim, Arab, African or Asian want to join a religion so obviously ethnically and religiously geared towards Europeans? Well, people do the strangest things for the strangest reasons. So, if there was a Church of Euródin before Ragnarök, it would have to respond to such a request and also observe the legal framework that is still provided by the current system.
The answer is: of course, only people of predominantly European descent should and can become members – this follows from the number fifteen as well. It is furthermore in their own interest, as otherwise they would anger their true God, be he Vé or Vili. For the unconsecrated there would probably be no harm in joining, but no benefit either. And it would anger Euródin, who wants to stay exclusively with his own. (Allowing for a generous marge of error in the determination of the ancestral status). A general exception for the unconsecrated would only be conceivable if they have consecrated children.